Ordinances Can Help Cities Preserve Streets

The need to maintain street infrastructure is a pressing and real concern for many cities in these tight budget times. It’s no secret that city streets cost a lot of money. The cost of street building materials is linked closely to the cost of oil – as oil prices rise, so do infrastructure costs. Even small street repairs can carry a large price tag.

In recent news reports, the American Society of Civil Engineers estimated the unfunded cost of repairing and updating the nation's roads, bridges, railways, ports, water systems and other critical assets at $2.2 trillion. (See http://tinyurl.com/2uqwsjl).

Since city streets are so expensive to build and repair, it makes good sense to use all the tools available to cities to protect existing roads. Ordinances are one tool available. City ordinances can help cities reduce the wear and tear on city existing streets – thereby reducing the need for costly repairs and extending the life of roads. Here are some suggested ordinance provisions aimed at protecting streets:

Heavy Load Restrictions:

Minn. Stat. § 169.87 allows cities to impose weight restrictions for trucks and commercial vehicles on city streets. In addition, weight restrictions may be imposed on all vehicles when the street, by reason of deterioration, rain, snow, or other climatic conditions, will be seriously damaged or destroyed by the use. Restrictions must be imposed by local ordinance and signage must be added to streets before the restrictions take effect. Local restrictions will not apply to:

• some implements of husbandry;
• school buses and HeadStart buses;
• some trucks transporting milk;
• some garbage and recycling vehicles; and
• some city vehicles (such as fire trucks).

Violation of city weight restrictions may subject a vehicle driver (or owner) to stiff civil penalties. In addition, Minn. Stat. § 169.88 requires the driver (or owner) to compensate the city for the damage to the street.

Once weight restrictions are in place, cities may also permit heavier loads pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 169.86. Terms for issuance of permits should be stated in local ordinance. In issuing a permit for a heavier load, cities may:

• prescribe conditions for operation of the vehicle to prevent undue damage to the road;
• require insurance, bond or other security in an amount necessary to compensate the city for any injury or damage to any roadway or road structure;
• require insurance, bond or other security in an amount necessary to compensate third parties for any injury or damage to persons or property.

The ability to permit heavier loads when needed, allows cities to set reasonable weight limits, while still retaining a degree of flexibility to accommodate special projects or events.

Damage from Negligence and Overt Acts:

Minn. Stat. § 160.2715 criminalizes obstructing and damaging state, town and county right-of-ways. Because of the peculiar wording of this chapter of law, these protections might not apply to cities (See Minn. Stat. § 160.02, Subd 25). As a result, cities may wish to adopt local ordinance provisions that prevent and criminalize:

• obstructing any street or ditch;
• digging any holes in any street;
• removing any earth, gravel, or rock from the street or ditches;
• committing actions that mar, damage, or tamper with any structure, work, material, equipment, tools, signs, markers, signals, paving, guardrails, drains, or any other street appurtenance on or along any street.

Organize Solid Waste, Garbage Collection:

Large solid waste (garbage) and recycling trucks can generate wear and tear on city streets. In part to limit such traffic, cities are authorized to organize (and limit) collection of garbage and recycling in their communities through local ordinance. It is important to note, however, that organizing collection involves more than passing a simple ordinance. State law requires cities to publish notice of intent to organize collection, hold public hearings and meet with stakeholders under very specific timelines.

Work, Excavation and Maintenance in the ROW:

The right-of-way (ROW) of city streets is a popular place to be. The ROW typically includes the traveled street as well as the ditches, shoulders and additional easement area on each side. All sorts of utility and cable lines may be located in the ROW, as well as private facilities of abutting landowners (for example, fences, signs and sprinkler systems).

Unfortunately, all this activity can result in damage to city streets. A solid ROW ordinance will require workers or contractors in the ROW to:

• notify the city that work in the ROW will occur;
• obtain a city permit prior to commencing work;
• repair any damage they create;
• adequately address safety issues (for example, warning cones and signs); and
• carry adequate bond or insurance to guarantee that damages are repaired.

A good ROW ordinance will insure that damages to the street created by private contractors to further their business interest are not being repaired by city taxpayers. LMC has a model ROW ordinance available at this link: http://www.lmc.org/media/document/1/modelrowordinance.pdf

The LMCIT memo Do You Know What’s In Your Right-of-Way? is a helpful guide to crafting provisions as well. This is available at: http://www.lmc.org/media/document/1/doyouknowwhatsinyourrightofway.pdf

Allowing Alternative Traffic:

Wear and tear from heavy vehicles may also be reduced by allowing residents to use alternative (and lighter) means of transportation on city streets. Minn. Stat. § 169.045 authorizes cities to adopt a local ordinance allowing special vehicle use on designated roadways – including motorized golf carts, four-wheel all-terrain vehicles, or mini trucks.

City ordinance must designate the specific roadways where the special vehicle traffic is allowed (this can only cover city streets – not state or county roads). In addition, the ordinance must require a city permit and insurance. More on this topic (including a sample ordinance) can be found in the LMC memo Special Vehicles Operating on City Streets at http://tinyurl.com/23fou6e

Some cities have also adopted ordinances that assist in the creation of “complete streets.” These ordinances facilitate greater use of non-motorized traffic such as bicycles on city streets. See this link for a recent news item for the City of Rochester: http://tinyurl.com/3ab75j7

Conclusion

Maintaining streets can be a daunting and expensive task for cities. While not a complete solution to the problem of deteriorating infrastructure, ordinances can help cities preserve and extend the useful life of their streets.

photo provided by: http://www.publicdomainpictures.net/view-image.php?image=2973&picture=construction-zone

How to Select a Codifier for City Ordinances

Hiring a codifier for city ordinances is a unique process – very different from purchasing city vehicles or equipment. When the quotes for services arrive and the (sometimes significant) money needs to be spent, city officials and staff may wonder - what are the characteristics of a good codifier? Or a great one? How do we differentiate among services offered?

It is essential to know that not all codifiers offer the types same services. When reviewing a quote, it is important to ask questions, so that the city knows exactly what it is getting for its money. Here are some suggestions for questions to ask a potential codifier – to help your city make an apples to apples, oranges to oranges comparison of vendors.

Legal Review

The most important question to ask a potential codifier is “do you provide legal review of city ordinances?” Some codifiers are simply organizers and publishers. They organize and number content from A-Z, create a table of contents, index and smartly bind your ordinances into a book. They do not look at content in ordinances. They cannot tell you whether or not your adult use ordinance passes constitutional muster. They can only tell you it is located in Chapter 10, at page 80 and is cross-referenced with “bookstores.”

Other vendors will review your ordinances during the codification process to make sure they are consistent with state and federal law (in addition to organizing and indexing). They will issue you a legal report, highlighting areas of concern. If the city works closely with an attorney to review and update ordinances on a regular basis, the city may not need legal review – just organization. However, if the city ordinance book is older or has been only infrequently updated, legal review is essential.

When seeking legal review from a codifier, some good follow-up questions are:

• How many Minnesota codebooks have you previously reviewed?
• Do you use attorneys to provide the legal review? Or only “legal editors.”
• Will the codifier send a sample legal review with their quote?
• At what point in the editing process with the legal report be provided?

Use of Graphics, Maps and Charts

Many cities these days are seeking to incorporate graphics, maps and charts into city ordinances. Use of graphics can simplify reading and explaining ordinances for both city staff and citizens. (I have previously blogged about this subject at this link: http://tinyurl.com/2evqg58).

If your city is interested in adding graphics (or may be in the future), it is important to discuss this with the codifier up front. Codification vendors may use very different computer software programs to organize ordinances. Not all programs readily incorporate graphics.

In addition, different codifiers may have different preferred methods for incorporating graphics (as links, as appendices at the ends of text, or added directly into the text). These methods may not be consistent with council and staff vision for using graphics. As a result, it is important to ask the codification vendor for samples of previous codes that included graphics.

Finally, cities should ask whether an additional fee is charged to incorporate graphics, charts or maps.

Electronic Formats and Options:

Many cities would like to feature their city code on their website. This is both a convenience to city residents and a timesaver for city staff. Electronic format and access issues should be discussed in depth with a potential codification vendor. For example:

• Does the codifier offer an electronic version of the city code? Is this version available on disk? Can it be placed on the city website?
• Is the electronic format searchable by “key word?”
• Are there extra fees associated with electronic copies?
• What software does the codifier use and will it be compatible with the city’s existing IT resources? Does the codifier offer IT training and phone support?
• Can the internet version of the code be updated as new ordinances are adopted? How frequently? At what charge?
• Can the codifier provide a list of cities (and web addresses) for city clients who have posted their codes online?

Conclusion

When buying a new car it may be easy for the buyer to call to mind the features they most want (air conditioning, side airbags, sun roof). When hiring a vendor to update the city code, the features of a good codifier may be less obvious. Hopefully asking some of these questions during the initial hiring stages will help avoid problems (or disappointed expectations) farther down the road.

Quick Tips on Understanding & Writing Ordinances

Recently I had the chance to speak to a group of new city clerks. Their excitement for a speech called “Quick Tips on Understanding & Writing Ordinances” took me a little bit by surprise. I was speaking just before lunch, and I expected several attendees (at least) to attempt to sneak out for a bite. Instead, several actually stayed for questions and missed most of their lunch.

I guess I shouldn’t have been surprised – ordinance drafting is a unique task found only in local government. Previous private sector jobs could easily prepare you for contract management, budgeting and personnel supervision – but it’s hard to think of anything analogous to ordinance drafting.

So here are my quick tips for understanding and writing better ordinances – whether you’re a novice or an expert.

Tip One:

Always keep in mind that your mission with writing an ordinance is to inform the reader what type of conduct is allowed or not allowed. Your goal is clarity. Your goal is not to impress (or confuse) the reader with your advanced knowledge of the more obscure reaches of the English language. This means avoiding legalese and using cross-references sparingly. Consider using pictures or diagrams to supplement text (see my previous blog entry on images in ordinances at http://tinyurl.com/2evqg58).

Tip Two:

Use definitions excessively. If you feel positive that you know the definition of “lawn and garden center” – there is a 100% chance that someone else will feel positive you’re wrong. A Minnesota city was once required to litigate all the way to the MN Supreme Court over this exact issue. See Frank's Nursery Sales, Inc. v. City of Roseville, 295 N.W.2d 604 (Minn. 1980). The best way to avoid conflicts over language is to define words carefully and often.

Tip Three:

Be cautious about using samples or models. Google has put a world of information at our fingertips – not all of it is good. Be wary of any sample that is older than 2-3 years. Ordinances have a very short shelf life, as they are affected by changing state laws and court cases. Be especially wary of older land use ordinances. Also be wary of out of state ordinances. Cities in other states may be subject to dramatically different laws than in Minnesota. For example, state laws may dictate very different holding periods for seized animals or abandoned cars.

Finally, be cautious about using model ordinances created by special interest groups or non-profits. Sometimes the agenda of the model ordinance writer is not at all clear from looking at the text (for example a model electronic billboard ordinance written by the billboard industry). Using models from special interest groups may leave regulation gaps that do not favor the city’s interests.

Tip Four:

Have your city attorney review your ordinances. This is especially true of land use, nuisance and ordinances affecting free speech (such as adult uses, signs, assemblies such as parades and protests, etc). Paying for your city attorney to review ordinances up front is always less expensive than defending a lawsuit further down the road.

Conclusion

Ordinance drafting can be a daunting task, but it doesn’t need to be difficult. A focus on clarity and definitions can go a long way. If you have another tip that has helped you, feel free to share in the comment section.

Image provided by: http://www.publicdomainpictures.net/view-image.php?image=3348&picture=pencil

Is Your Liquor Ordinance Tight Enough to Hold Water (Or Beer)?

Its closing time, and you may be wondering where your liquor ordinance is. Is it working for your city? Is it drafted to require patrons to stop drinking and start heading home in a prompt manner? Does it require bar staff to vacate the city premises within ½ hour of closing? Or is it letting those wily partiers simply close the doors and claim that they’re having a private party where (wink, wink) no one is being served.

Or is it license renewal time and you’re faced with a bar owner who won’t maintain the bar’s property. Are you wondering if you’ll be able to deny the renewal, because of the litter on the property? Have you checked your ordinance lately?

Or maybe the city has a bar owner who doesn’t hire adequate security and allows fights to break out. Or regularly violates noise restrictions and now the city would like to revoke the establishment’s liquor license. Does your ordinance address the procedures the council should follow to provide sufficient due process? Council may fear letting the bar owner continue to endanger the public, but also the lawsuit that might result if the disgruntled bar owner doesn’t get a fair process.

Over the years, I have heard staff and officials voice these types of nuisance concerns about liquor establishments in their city many times. Often they want to know if state law covers their concerns and provides a means to address them. Most of the time, however, it simply doesn’t. This surprises many city officials.

State Law Regulation of Liquor Establishments:

The Minnesota Liquor Act heavily regulates two main issues. First, it regulates the issuance of licenses (types of licenses, who gets them, insurance required, license fees, etc). Second, it regulates illegal sales (to minors or obviously intoxicated persons, at the wrong day or time, etc.) and related dram shop liability issues. The Liquor Act doesn’t offer much to help cities trying to deal with nuisance behaviors that can occur around liquor establishments – for example, unsightly properties, noise and disorderly conduct.

Fortunately, the Liquor Act favors city ordinance regulation on these topics. Minn. Stat. § 340A.509 states, “a local authority may impose further restrictions and regulations on the sale and possession of alcoholic beverages within its limits.” As a result, city ordinance may always be more restrictive than the Liquor Act and it can certainly “fill in the blanks” where state law is silent.

What Should We Include in Our Liquor Ordinance?

Here are some suggestions for provisions to include in your local liquor ordinance to make it tight enough to hold water (or beer). These suggestions all relate to issues generally not covered in depth by the Liquor Act. Most of these suggestions are drawn from the Model LMC Liquor Licensing Ordinance that can be found at this link: http://www.lmc.org/media/document/1/liquorlicensingandregulation.pdf. You can also find detailed sample language for these provisions there.

Evacuation Clause:

An evacuation clause requires the bar to have a “last call” and to have customers leave promptly at closing time. This prevents lingering and socializing that may create a noise nuisance or other disorderly conduct. It also reduces the temptation for illegal sales when the bar doors have closed to the public and the supposed “private party” commences. Some evacuation clauses also require staff to leave the premises within a reasonable time after closing, while still allowing for clean-up and other end of shift activities.

Nudity and Adult Uses:

Cities may ban liquor establishments from having adult entertainment or nudity on the premises. The First Amendment offers important protections to exotic dancers and other adult uses. However, the First Amendment does not protect the right of people to drink while performing (or watching) exotic dancing.

Location of Liquor Establishments:

For cities, the only state Liquor Act restriction on liquor establishment location relates to state facilities and zoning. Minn. Stat. § 340A.412 prohibits locating a liquor establishment in “areas restricted against commercial uses through zoning.” Cities who don’t want liquor establishments near schools, daycares, churches or youth centers should put these restrictions in their local ordinance. If a city doesn’t have zoning in place, the city may also wish to restrict location near residences as well.

Types of Licenses:

Over the past few years, the State Legislature has added several new types of licenses to the Liquor Act. It has also broadened the categories of businesses that may receive existing licenses. If you haven’t updated your liquor ordinance in the past decade, you may be missing out on brew-pub licenses, culinary class licenses and wine licenses for theaters. Cities are not required to issue these types of licenses, but if they choose to issue, must authorize them through local ordinance.

Times and Days of Sale:

Cities are authorized by Minn. Stat. § 340A.504 to restrict times and days of sale beyond state law requirements. However, restricted on-sale hours for intoxicating liquor must apply equally to on-sale hours of 3.2 percent malt liquor. A city may not permit the sale of alcoholic beverages during hours when the sale is prohibited by the Liquor Act.

Define Liquor Act Terms More Restrictively:

The Liquor Act allows restaurants to obtain on-sale licenses. Minn. Stat. § 340A.101 Subd. 25 defines the term restaurant pretty simply as “an establishment . . . where meals are regularly prepared on the premises and served at tables to the general public, and having a minimum seating capacity for guests as prescribed by the appropriate license issuing authority.” Cities may wish to define a restaurant more narrowly. For example, requiring a certain percentage of the profits to be related to food sales, require a minimum seating capacity, require menus and waiters, and prohibit “heat and eat” type establishments where only pizza is reheated and offered to customers.

Cities may also wish to define the terms “non-profit” or “charitable organization” for the purpose of temporary 3.2 beer licenses under Minn. Stat. § 340A.403 and “compact and contiguous” for the purposes of Minn. Stat. § 340A.410. These are both relatively vague terms found in the Liquor Act that raise concerns from time to time.

Due Process Concerns

Violations of city liquor ordinances can result in both civil and criminal penalties. As a result, ordinances should be written clearly to avoid US Constitutional 14th Amendment concerns (ordinances provisions that are vague will be considered void). The city liquor ordinance should specify the types of behaviors/problems that may result in penalties. This puts the liquor licensee on notice that they may be punished –either civilly or criminally – for violations.

There are also state law due process requirements that should be met in the city liquor ordinance. The Liquor Act at Minn. Stat. § 340A.415 specifically enumerates acts for which a license may be revoked or a penalty imposed. This is a limited list that includes:

• Selling alcoholic beverages to another retail licensee for the purpose of resale;

• Purchasing alcoholic beverages from another retail licensee for the purpose of resale

• Conducting or permitting the conduct of gambling on the licensed premises in violation of the law;

• Failing to remove or dispose of alcoholic beverages when ordered by the commissioner to do so; and

• Failing to comply with an applicable statute, rule, or ordinance relating to alcoholic beverages,

As a result, cities are limited by the Liquor Act to revoking licenses or imposing civil penalties for issues that violate city ordinance. Prohibited nuisance behaviors should be listed and defined in the liquor ordinance, if the city would like to revoke licenses or impose penalties related to these issues. For example, litter, noise, disorderly conduct, etc. The city may also choose to simply cross-reference other sections of city ordinance on these topics in the liquor ordinance.

Finally, the Liquor Act requires that notice and hearing must be provided to a licensee prior to a suspicion or revocation. As a result, city ordinance should also specify procedures for notice, hearing and imposition of any penalty.

Conclusion

Liquor establishments can be thriving local businesses that add to the local community and economy. However, these types of businesses may also create unique nuisance concerns. A carefully drafted city liquor ordinance must be the bedrock for city regulation and enforcement efforts.